Timeline for Are questions involving legal issues and 3D printing on-topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 13:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://law.stackexchange.com/ with https://law.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 13, 2016 at 17:16 | comment | added | Zizouz212 | @TomvanderZanden You can't migrate to law. I think questions about regulations concerning these are highly relevant. Honestly, just because something is on-topic on another site, doesn't mean it should be off-topic here. | |
| Jan 13, 2016 at 16:27 | comment | added | HDE 226868 | We most likely don't have a lot of folks who are well-acquainted with 3D-printing law. However, that doesn't mean that we can't recruit folks, or that we can't attract users from Law. Experts don't always restrict themselves to one site. . . :-) | |
| Jan 13, 2016 at 8:11 | comment | added | Dawny33 | @TomvanderZanden But, when it deals with Law, I think it would be better to let the Law people handle it :) Users here might be good at 3D printing related law, but there are more than just 3D printing based law, like material selection, etc which are not here now, but might pop up later. So, IMHO those would be best dealt in the Law SE :) | |
| Jan 13, 2016 at 8:09 | comment | added | Tom van der Zanden | Migrating to Law doesn't guarantee the advice won't be wrong or unreliable either - any advice you get on the internet is bound to be unreliable. The people on this site understand 3D printing much better than law, and the Law people know law much better than 3D printing. The ideal advice would come from somebody with experience of both. In our case, I think our user base may have a lot of unique knowledge (some of our more experienced users may have consulted lawyers before, for instance when starting their own companies) regarding legal issues and 3D printing. | |
| Jan 13, 2016 at 7:30 | history | answered | Dawny33 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |